MEASURES
TO CURB EXPENDITURE
Ostentatious
display of money power in the form of huge cut-outs,
hoardings, banners, etc.,
Election Commission's order No.
3/10/(ES007)/94-JSII, Dated : 2nd September, 1994
------------------------------------------------------Order
Subject:- Ostentatious display of
money power in the form of huge cut-outs, hoardings,
banners, etc., during elections.
Sub-section (1) of section 77 of the Representation
of the People Act, 1951 provides that "Every
candidate at an election shall, either by himself or
by his election agent, keep a separate and correct
account of all expenditure in connection with the
election incurred or authorised by him or by his
election agent between the date on which he has been
nominated and the date of declaration of the result
thereof, both dates inclusive".
2. Sub-section (3) of the said section 77 further
provides that the total of the expenditure referred
to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed such amount as
may be prescribed. Such amounts are prescribed for
all parliamentary and assembly constituencies in
various States and Union Territories under rule 90 of
the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961.
3. The underlying object of the above provision of
law fixing a ceiling on the election expenditure of
candidates is that the money power does not play any
pernicious role in the field of elections and the
candidates with huge monetary resources do not sway
or cloud the judgement and rational thinking of the
common electors with the ostentatious use of money
power placing the candidates with lower financial
resources at a distinctly disadvantageous position.
The intended salutary purpose of the law has,
however, been defeated by Explanation (1) to the
above-referred sub-section (1) of section 77 as
inserted in 1974 to provide that "any
expenditure incurred or authorised in connection with
the election of a candidate by a political party or
by any other association or body of persons or by any
individual (other than the candidate or his election
agent) shall not be deemed to be, and shall not ever
be deemed to have been, expenditure in connection
with the election incurred or authorised by the
candidate or by his election agent" for the
purposes of the said sub-section (1) of section 77.
4. The Commission has time and again pointed out the
total and absolute inefficacy of the law relating to
election expenditure as amended in 1974, but it has
failed to evoke any response whatsoever from the
Govt. on the remedial measures suggested by it to
place curbs on the vitiating and corrupting effect of
money power on elections and making the law on the
subject really meaningful.
5. The absolute meaninglessness of the existing law
on election expenditure can not be better described
than in the words of the Supreme Court in two of its
recent judgments. The Supreme Court observed in its
judgment dated 19.11.1993, in Gadakh Yashwantrao
Kankarrao Vs-E.V. alias Balasaheb Vikhe Patil and
others (Civil Appeals Nos-2115, 2116, 2444 and 1758
of 1993) that:
"The existing law does not measure up to the
existing realities. The ceiling on expenditure is
fixed only in respect of the expenditure incurred or
authorised by the candidate himself but the
expenditure incurred by the party or anyone else in
his election campaign is safely outside the net of
legal sanction. The spirit of the provision suffers
violation through the escape route. The prescription
of ceiling on expenditure by a candidate is a mere
eye-wash and no practical check on election expenses
for which it was enacted to attain a meaningful
democracy. This lacuna in the law is, however, for
the Parliament to fill least the impression is
reinforced that its retention is deliberate for the
convenience of everyone. If this be not feasible, it
may advisable to omit the provision to prevent the
resort to indirect methods for its circumvention and
subversion of the law, accepting without any qualm
the role of money power in the elections. This
provision has ceased to be even a fig leaf to hide
the reality."
BACK TO INDEX I NEXT PAGE I NEXT DOCUMENT